What is the difference between ABB Freelance and System 800xA?

Freelance is designed for small to medium applications (50-5,000+ I/O) with integrated engineering tools and lower complexity. System 800xA is an enterprise-level DCS for medium to large operations (1,000-100,000+ I/O) with extensive integration capabilities, MES/ERP connectivity, and maximum flexibility. They are parallel product lines serving different market segments.

Did System 800xA replace Freelance?

No. Freelance and System 800xA are parallel product lines, both actively developed and supported by ABB. They serve different application sizes and requirements. Freelance remains the right choice for many small to medium applications. The AC800M controller (used in 800xA) superseded the older AC450 (Advant Master), not the Freelance F-line controllers.

Which ABB DCS is more cost-effective?

For smaller systems under 5,000 I/O, Freelance typically has lower total cost of ownership due to simpler engineering, integrated components, and faster deployment. For large, complex systems requiring enterprise integration, 800xA provides better value despite higher initial costs because its advanced features are fully utilized.

Guides/Comparisons

ABB Freelance vs System 800xA

Both are industry-leading DCS platforms from ABB, but they serve different needs. This guide helps you understand when to choose Freelance versus System 800xA.

The Short Answer

Choose Freelance if:

Your plant has <5,000 I/O points
You need a self-contained, integrated system
Budget and time-to-deploy are priorities
You want simpler engineering/maintenance

Choose 800xA if:

Your plant has >5,000 I/O or will grow significantly
You need deep integration with MES/ERP/historians
You have multiple plants needing enterprise visibility
Maximum flexibility and future-proofing are critical

Detailed Comparison

Aspect	ABB Freelance	ABB System 800xA
Target Application	Small to medium plants, OEM packages, standalone systems	Medium to large facilities, enterprise integration, complex operations
Typical I/O Range	50 – 5,000+ I/O points	1,000 – 100,000+ I/O points
Controller Family	AC700F, AC800F, AC900F (F-line)	AC800M (M-line)
Engineering Software	Control Builder F (integrated)	Compact Control Builder or 800xA Engineering Workspace
Operator Interface	DigiVis (included)	800xA Operations / PGP (Plant Graphics Portal)
Architecture	Self-contained DCS with integrated components	Modular, highly customizable enterprise platform
Redundancy	Optional controller and network redundancy	Full redundancy options at all levels
Third-Party Integration	Fieldbus protocols, OPC, Modbus	Extensive: OPC UA, MES, ERP, historians, third-party PLCs
Relative Cost	Lower initial cost, faster ROI for smaller projects	Higher initial cost, justified for large/complex systems
Engineering Complexity	Simpler, faster to learn and deploy	More complex, greater flexibility and capability

Important: They're Parallel, Not Replacements

A common misconception is that System 800xA "replaced" Freelance. This is incorrect.

Freelance and 800xA are parallel product lines actively developed and supported by ABB. They serve different market segments and application sizes. Freelance remains the right choice for many applications, while 800xA serves those needing enterprise-scale capabilities.

Controller Differences

Each platform uses different controller hardware:

Freelance Controllers (F-Line)

AC700F — Entry-level, compact (~300 I/O)
AC800F — Mid-range, modular (~1,000 I/O)
AC900F — High-end, maximum I/O (~1,500 I/O)

All use Control Builder F for programming.

800xA Controllers (M-Line)

AC800M — Modular, scalable architecture
Can be configured with Compact Control Builder or 800xA Engineering
Supports massive I/O counts and enterprise integration

Note: AC800M superseded the older AC450 (Advant Master), not the F-line.

Application Examples

Freelance is Ideal For:

Municipal water/wastewater plants
Food & beverage batch operations
Pharmaceutical manufacturing suites
OEM skid packages
Small chemical plants

800xA is Ideal For:

Large petrochemical refineries
Power generation plants
Mining operations
Multi-site enterprise operations
Facilities requiring MES/ERP integration

Cost Considerations

While specific pricing depends on project scope, here are general considerations:

$
Freelance typically has lower hardware, software, and engineering costs for smaller systems. Faster deployment means quicker ROI.
$$
800xA has higher initial costs but provides greater value for large, complex systems where its advanced features are fully utilized.

Still Not Sure Which Platform to Choose?

Our engineers have implemented hundreds of both Freelance and 800xA systems. Let us help you evaluate your requirements and recommend the right solution.

Get Expert Advice